Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Nano Banana 3 Pro
A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) against Nano Banana 3 Pro (Google DeepMind).
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Developed by Anthropic · Proprietary Frontier Dynamic Hybrid Reasoner parameters
Terminal-Bench 4.0 execution (70.6%), SWE-bench Verified coding (82.4%), GitHub Copilot multi-file edits, and low-latency autonomous agentic coding at $2/$10 pricing.
Nano Banana 3 Pro
Developed by Google DeepMind · 2.8 Billion Parameters parameters
Zero-latency mobile on-device reasoning, 82ms TTFT, offline audio-visual tool execution, and local Android system integration.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Nano Banana 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 82.4% | 58.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 88.4% | 74.2% |
| MATH-500 | 95.2% | 82.5% |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Input Pricing (per 1M) | $2.00 | $0.00 |
| Output Pricing (per 1M) | $10.00 | $0.00 |