Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Pro
A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) against Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Pro (Xiaomi AI Lab (Fuli Luo)).
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Developed by Anthropic · Proprietary Frontier Dynamic Hybrid Reasoner parameters
Terminal-Bench 4.0 execution (70.6%), SWE-bench Verified coding (82.4%), GitHub Copilot multi-file edits, and low-latency autonomous agentic coding at $2/$10 pricing.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Pro
Developed by Xiaomi AI Lab (Fuli Luo) · 1.02 Trillion (Sparse MoE) parameters
High-accuracy autonomous coding (71.9% DeepSWE), cybersecurity defense (94.0% CyberGym), multimodal document reasoning, and cost-effective agentic workflows.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 82.4% | 71.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 88.4% | 89.2% |
| MATH-500 | 95.2% | 93.8% |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input Pricing (per 1M) | $2.00 | $0.10 |
| Output Pricing (per 1M) | $10.00 | $0.20 |