Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Flash
A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) against Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Flash (Xiaomi AI Lab).
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Developed by Anthropic · Proprietary Frontier Dynamic Hybrid Reasoner parameters
Terminal-Bench 4.0 execution (70.6%), SWE-bench Verified coding (82.4%), GitHub Copilot multi-file edits, and low-latency autonomous agentic coding at $2/$10 pricing.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Flash
Developed by Xiaomi AI Lab · 185 Billion (Sparse MoE) parameters
Low-latency agent loops, high-volume classification, and developer code completion.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 82.4% | 64.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 88.4% | 82.4% |
| MATH-500 | 95.2% | 89.5% |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input Pricing (per 1M) | $2.00 | $0.04 |
| Output Pricing (per 1M) | $10.00 | $0.08 |