Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B
A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) against Llama 3.3 70B (Meta AI).
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Developed by Anthropic · Proprietary Frontier Dynamic Hybrid Reasoner parameters
Terminal-Bench 4.0 execution (70.6%), SWE-bench Verified coding (82.4%), GitHub Copilot multi-file edits, and low-latency autonomous agentic coding at $2/$10 pricing.
Llama 3.3 70B
Developed by Meta AI · 70.6B parameters
Self-hosted on-premise deployments and edge dense inference.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 82.4% | 38.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 88.4% | 68.3% |
| MATH-500 | 95.2% | 75.8% |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input Pricing (per 1M) | $2.00 | $0.15 |
| Output Pricing (per 1M) | $10.00 | $0.60 |