Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) against Gemini 4 Argon (Google DeepMind).
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Developed by Anthropic · Proprietary Frontier Dynamic Hybrid Reasoner parameters
Terminal-Bench 4.0 execution (70.6%), SWE-bench Verified coding (82.4%), GitHub Copilot multi-file edits, and low-latency autonomous agentic coding at $2/$10 pricing.
Gemini 4 Argon
Developed by Google DeepMind · Frontier Coding & Security Engine on TPU v6e Ironclad parameters
Automated GitHub issue resolution (78.4% SWE-bench Verified), cybersecurity exploit auditing (91.4% CyberSecBench), 2M token context buffer, and aggressive $1.20/$4.80 API pricing.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 82.4% | 78.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 88.4% | 93.6% |
| MATH-500 | 95.2% | 97.6% |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 2,000,000 tokens |
| Input Pricing (per 1M) | $2.00 | $1.20 |
| Output Pricing (per 1M) | $10.00 | $4.80 |