Claude Opus 5.5 vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Flash
A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) against Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Flash (Xiaomi AI Lab).
Claude Opus 5.5
Developed by Anthropic · Proprietary Frontier Reasoner parameters
Autonomous enterprise codebase migrations, GitHub Copilot multi-file edits, SWE-bench Pro issue resolution (89.9%), and CodeRabbit automated reviews.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Flash
Developed by Xiaomi AI Lab · 185 Billion (Sparse MoE) parameters
Low-latency agent loops, high-volume classification, and developer code completion.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 89.9% | 64.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 92.4% | 82.4% |
| MATH-500 | 97.2% | 89.5% |
| Context Window | 500,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input Pricing (per 1M) | $4.00 | $0.04 |
| Output Pricing (per 1M) | $20.00 | $0.08 |