Claude Opus 5.5 (Canary Checkpoint) vs Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Pro
A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Opus 5.5 (Canary Checkpoint) (Anthropic) against Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Pro (Xiaomi AI Lab (Fuli Luo)).
Claude Opus 5.5 (Canary Checkpoint)
Developed by Anthropic · Frontier Mixture-of-Experts Architecture parameters
Autonomous repository issue resolution (81.4% SWE-bench Verified), native 3D glTF/OBJ mesh synthesis, and sub-300ms time-to-first-token.
Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Pro
Developed by Xiaomi AI Lab (Fuli Luo) · 1.02 Trillion (Sparse MoE) parameters
High-accuracy autonomous coding (71.9% DeepSWE), cybersecurity defense (94.0% CyberGym), multimodal document reasoning, and cost-effective agentic workflows.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Canary Checkpoint) | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 81.4% | 71.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 94.2% | 89.2% |
| MATH-500 | 97.9% | 93.8% |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input Pricing (per 1M) | $5.00 | $0.10 |
| Output Pricing (per 1M) | $25.00 | $0.20 |