Claude Opus 5.5 (Canary Checkpoint) vs GPT-6 Sol
A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Opus 5.5 (Canary Checkpoint) (Anthropic) against GPT-6 Sol (OpenAI).
Claude Opus 5.5 (Canary Checkpoint)
Developed by Anthropic · Frontier Mixture-of-Experts Architecture parameters
Autonomous repository issue resolution (81.4% SWE-bench Verified), native 3D glTF/OBJ mesh synthesis, and sub-300ms time-to-first-token.
GPT-6 Sol
Developed by OpenAI · Proprietary Frontier Workhorse parameters
High-efficiency agentic software development, OSWorld computer use, repository refactoring, and enterprise workflow execution at 80% lower cost per task than Claude Opus.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Canary Checkpoint) | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 81.4% | 68.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 94.2% | 90.8% |
| MATH-500 | 97.9% | 96.4% |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Input Pricing (per 1M) | $5.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Pricing (per 1M) | $25.00 | $10.00 |