Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst)

A direct, empirical evaluation of Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) against GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst) (OpenAI).

Claude Fable 5.1

Developed by Anthropic · Proprietary Frontier parameters

Full-repository software refactoring, agentic tool workflows, formal verification, and 1.5M-token needle retrieval.

GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst)

Developed by OpenAI · Proprietary Multimodal DiT parameters

High-fidelity typographic rendering, raytracing reflection accuracy, sketch-to-image conditioning, and localized comment inpainting.

Metric Claude Fable 5.1 GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst)
SWE-bench Verified 82.8% 62.4%
MMLU-Pro 92.4% 89.5%
MATH-500 97.9% 91.2%
Context Window 1,500,000 tokens Spatial Vector Token Canvas (1792×1024)
Input Pricing (per 1M) $12.00 $2.50
Output Pricing (per 1M) $60.00 $10.00

Architectural & Practical Deployment Analysis

Evaluating Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) alongside GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst) (OpenAI) highlights key technical trade-offs across neural parameter scale and compute efficiency. Claude Fable 5.1 executes across Proprietary Frontier total parameters with Dynamic Recurrent MoE active per token, whereas GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst) operates on Proprietary Multimodal DiT parameters with Continuous Flow Transformer active per token.

On SWE-bench Verified software engineering tasks, Claude Fable 5.1 achieves 82.8% autonomous resolution rate, compared to 62.4% for GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst). On complex reasoning benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 posts 92.4% on MMLU-Pro and 97.9% on MATH-500, against 89.5% and 91.2% respectively for GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst).

From an operational economics perspective, processing 10,000,000 mixed tokens (7M input / 3M output) costs approximately $264.00 on Claude Fable 5.1 versus $47.50 on GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst).

Recommendation: Deploy Claude Fable 5.1 when your infrastructure prioritizes full-repository software refactoring, agentic tool workflows, formal verification, and 1.5m-token needle retrieval.. Deploy GPT-Image-2.5 (Sunburst) when workload requirements favor high-fidelity typographic rendering, raytracing reflection accuracy, sketch-to-image conditioning, and localized comment inpainting..